Golden News
Volume 14 Number 33


The Weekly Bulletin of the Rotary Club of Kowloon Golden Mile www.rckgm.org 

February is Rotary World Understanding Month

 
Birthday Girl!
 
Patricia Blair - 4th March, 2000
 

 
                                Last Meeting

The formal part of the meeting began at 1.15 pm with President Cassidy his usual cheerful and immaculate self. Acting  Sergeant  Rtn Suzie  did the fines  for the first time  and  did  well. I suppose it's a bit like collecting fees from  physical  fitness customers when they are strapped into some kind of rack-like item of  equipment  in   the gym and  can't escape. Then  Rtn Kumar  introduced  Visiting  Rotarian,   Lal Hardasani  - Classification   Insurance   -  From   Peninsula Rotary Club,  and   Rtn  Per Larsen  introduced  Guests of Rotarians: Rtn Lal  -  Raju Sabnani and Hiro Khemlani and Rtn David  -  Nasreen  Ting all from Hong Kong! Community Service Director Rtn Silva then  reported on KGM's representatives' participation in the  St. James Settlement  family  Club's AGM  and  Chinese  dinner and  their  presentation of a  book  and  token. PP Vince next introduced    the several address lists now available on our Web Page, for KGM members only and        the RCKGM banner post-card which is somewhere on the Web Page but I forget where Vince said it was and I haven't been able to find it! Oh dear.

PP Vince then introduced the Speaker, Mr Peter Gallo MB  a former Military Intelligence Officer and lawyer who gave a fascinating insight into the not so well known world of corporate investigations. Our speaker very kindly gave me the following text.

I almost forgot, attendance was quite good. 39!! Better!!!!

 

HOW AND WHY CORPORATE INVESTIGATION CASES GO HORRIBLY WRONG
Peter A Gallo, Director Pacific Risk Ltd
 
Last time, I spoke about the process of how a corporate investigation is run.  Today, I am going to cover more than you really want to know about how & why cases go horribly wrong. It is probably more interesting. With my background and in this line of business, it is assumed that I work with characters straight out of a John Le Carre novel.   That, however, has turned out to be the myth I am most keen to dispel…
The most likely reason for you to want to engage someone like me, is for a “Due Diligence” job. This would typically involve looking into the background and reputation of an individual or a company in order to determine whether there is something about them that you, as a potential investor, might want to know about.  The investigator’s role is to expand on the work done by your lawyers and accountants and try to determine whether there is anything that we ought reasonably be able to find, which might come as an unpleasant surprise if it were revealed later. Sometimes this results in a spectacular disclosure; sometimes I have been able to provide information, which has alerted a potential investor to a fraud or a money laundering scheme. On other occasions, however, where there was no information to suggest that the subject was a major international drug-smuggling killer, the subject might just turn out to be an ordinary, mild mannered Chartered Accountant; the client has had the reassurance that they have taken all reasonably prudent steps to minimise their risk.
With that brief, therefore, why do things go wrong? In my experience, things go wrong for one (or more) of FIVE main reasons.
·       clients have expectations which are unrealistic, or patently even illegal. 
More often, however, it is not the client who is at fault as much as the investigator because
·       he asks the wrong question or the wrong person, or
·       just fails to understand the problem, and this is not altogether unconnected with
·       native stupidity. This also covers inadequate preparation, and is also connected to the last reason, which I think is probably the single greatest handicap that any investigator can suffer from;
·       ego.  This manifests itself (dangerously) in two ways:
one, is thinking that he has the answer before doing the work, so the “investigation” turns into a self-serving exercise in proving how correct he was all along, and the other, is in not accepting that his particular source may not have the correct information.
I have found that you can re-organise these categories more or less any way you like, certainly the root cause of most of the problems I have seen is a lethal cocktail of stupidity and ego.
However, let me proceed on these headings, all of which are interconnected.
 
UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS 
One of the problems that I encounter is clients having expectations which I consider to be unrealistic. Often, however, there is a good reason why they have such expectations and that is that they believe what the zealous salesman tells them. More often than not, however, the blame for this cannot really be laid on the client. The client’s mistake is in listening to what somebody assured him could be done…
I said earlier, about the objective in a DD job - information that ought reasonably to be available.  If it later turned out that your JV partner turned out to be a secret opium-smoking cross-dresser who murdered his granny, only to be “exposed” on a TV documentary, and I had not reported that in my DD report, I am terribly sorry, but if it was not widely known, the chances are that you would not be the only one that was surprised.
There is (sometimes) a difference between reputation and reality.
Under this category, I should mention one of Hong Kong’s favourites, which is identifying the directors and shareholders of a BVI company.   If anyone tells you they can do this, you may find that they don’t understand the problem!   The BVI is often the investigators nemesis, especially when companies are incorporated with bearer shares.  If your investigator doesn’t understand their significance, you may not be impressed with the rest of his work either. I have conclusively proved ownership of a BVI company only twice; and been unable to do so much more often.
There is a (moveable) line to be drawn between being successful and being discreet.
I am sometimes asked to provide a level of information which would require me to have someone so close to the subject that he would have to be in bed with him, tucked in between him and his mistress… (and not only that, but to do it in such a way that there was absolutely no way that the subject would even know he was there) … Please make your mind up! Very often, I know where the answer is, but I just can’t get it.  I may even know the lawyer in whose filing cabinet the answer is hidden, but cannot, or will not, proceed any further beyond that. I am often asked if I can tap telephones, obtain bank account records or other confidential information.  This is a fine idea, and would be marvelously successful were it not for the fact it was illegal and I would go direct to jail for doing so.  (I would not pass ‘Go’ and I would not collect $200). However, there is always somebody who claims he knows somebody who can do the job cheaper, easier, faster, better than I can.  I accept that.  However, let us assume that one of the givens is the need for absolute confidentiality; consider what is likely to happen when (on your instruction) some gentlemen are arrested in your competitor’s office one night and charged with burglary. As the late ex-President Nixon found out to his cost; this sort of thing short-circuits back and causes a very considerable amount of embarrassment.
What about the situation where the case is overseas, say, in Indonesia or Thailand? Let me sidetrack for a moment and explain that I have only two inviolate ground rules:
One: Thou shalt NOT do anything which is against the law
Two: Thou shalt NOT do anything which could embarrass the client
(You are free to embarrass yourself, but never the client.) So Rule one above answers any questions you might have about what happens in Indonesia, except for that I don’t have the time today to explain about sub-contractors and the men-in-black who actually run about the streets of Jakarta allowing somebody like me to operate Asia-wide.
 
ASKING THE WRONG QUESTION OR THE WRONG PERSON
A common Asian problem is giving the answer the person thinks you want. Do you know so-and-so?  Is he OK? In my field, I often make the mistake of tasking the wrong sub-contractor. Unfortunately, you only ever know that after the event, for example I sent someone to check out a “Dive” shop in Phuket, not realizing exactly what this meant but learned too late it was a diving equipment and training outfit which I knew more about than the person I sent which is also a good example of:
 
FAILING TO UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM
I also mentioned this earlier in connection with investigators claiming to be able to identify shareholders in a BVI company. More often, however, the investigator is simply THICK, and doesn’t understand the industry, for example I have experience of a matter under investigation which involved “cargo transfer”, which was described as a “shipping fraud” but had no connection with shipping. Sometimes this isn’t the investigators fault, because the client doesn’t understand the gravity of the situation.  I myself have been involved in a couple of these. One such case involved someone who, as a little “side” business, was involved in a karaoke lounge in Macau.  The client had not appreciated what other peripheral activities that may have involved, or the sort of company you might keep as a result.  On another occasion, I was involved in a DD case into an individual who ran a small trading company in the Philippines.  He was a middle-man, supplying military hardware to the Armed Forces, which was fine, but the DD was instructed by his own principals. In that case, the client sent me a list of Generals and Admirals who they wanted me to interview, and ask about bribery and corruption.  As if that wasn’t bad enough, they then expected me to investigate the backgrounds of these Generals and Admirals.  That was when I began to wonder what it was that they were smoking…
 
NATIVE STUPIDITY 
I think it was Einstein that said the difference between Stupidity and the Universe was that the Universe was probably finite. In major investigations, one of the reasons things fall apart is lack of attention to detail, a lack of proper preparation and planning.  There are too many examples; too many to mention:
·       Going to a meeting where somebody admitted to a fraud; having put the recording tape in the wrong way round.
·       Surveillance team walking around a cargo pier in suits, carrying shoulder bags.
This often manifests itself in making pretext phone calls, which are simply not credible. People often fail to realise that a simple lie, like an investigator trying to pass himself off as a journalist, might be successful if the person on the other end of the phone is even thicker than you, but it actually takes a lot of back-up.  You probably all know the case, which happened about a year ago, where an investigator sent an e-mail message from a hotmail account, which identified the company whose network it had been sent from…
 
EGO 
For reasons I have never fully understood, many people in the investigation business have massive egos, which would be fine, of course, were it not for the fact that their role is supposed to be to slide in and out of places without making a fuss and thereafter NOT to mouth off and tell the world everything about it.
A large ego and a small intellect are a very dangerous combination.
The reason I single this out as a major fault is that it impacts back on my first point, about clients’ unrealistic expectations.  Where did they get such expectations in the first place?  More often than not, it turns out, from the investigator who assured them he was so brilliant that he could do the job without breaking a sweat. Often, this over-confidence is sign of other problems just waiting to appear.  One of these is that the investigator believes he knows the answer because really, he is smarter than you, the client.  He has already decided what the answer is, so the work that he does is very far from impartial and (subconsciously or otherwise) he is trying to justify his own preconception. Several of the examples I have already mentioned can be attributed to the person running the case putting too much faith in his own contacts - the “My Source” syndrome.  Everyone likes to think they have a good network of contacts, the problem (especially in the investigation business) is when your ego will not accept the possibility that somebody else may have a better one, or you won’t accept that your guy is wrong. Reality : You are only as good as your least bad mistake.
 
CONCLUSION 
The downside, as in much investigation work, is that making a mess of a case usually puts the client in a worse position than he was at the beginning, worse even than had he done nothing at all. I hope I haven’t left you with the impression that this is a business where everything goes wrong all the time.  The reality is that we have spectacular successes, saving clients their reputations or millions of dollars of their money on a regular basis, but the nature of the business is such that I cannot then go on TV or take half a page in the newspaper to tell the world all about it. You, as the client, may chose to do so; my experience is that you won’t. I am pleased to say that none of the examples I have quoted have been mine, but don’t think that means I have never made a mistake. I sometimes get it wrong as well, but I do make a committed effort not to. At least I am proud to say I have never had a case that ended up on the front page of the Morning Post. I would like to say I have never had an unhappy client, but that is not technically true; but I have only ever really had a problem with overseas investigation firms I was sub-contracting for.  (Sitting in New York, of course, means you understand the subtleties of how to get jobs done discreetly around Shanghai much better than ever I will…).
 
Following a lively session of questions very skillfully and truthfully answered PP Bryan Van Dale gave the vote of thanks.
 

 
Next Meeting
12:30 p.m. Wednesday 28 February, 2001
Speaker: CIP Bob White - "Crime Prevention"

 
On Vocation! With   
Rotarian Per Larsen
         Classification, Trading, Consumer Electronics

As a child I was brought up in Denmark and Spain, and also lived 1 year as an exchange student in Germany, which has given me a good understanding of languages and cultural differences. I have attended a Spanish, an English School and American College while living in Spain and a German highschool. In 1992 I graduated from the Copenhagen Business Academy with a Bachelor in International Marketing, and already the same year I started the company STOCKSHOP OF DENMARK A/S, which is the foundation for the business which I have today.
As mentioned, I started my own business just after I graduated from the business academy . During my education I had been working in a Danish food export company selling to mainly Russia. I had been on various business trips to Russia and had noticed the huge volume of electronics been sold there. After my suggestion to the management to start a consumer electronics division, which was rejected, I decided to start my own business specialised in the export of consumer electronics to Russia, which later has spread to almost all markets in Eastern Europe. In 1998 my company was on the TOP 50 list for the fast growing companies in Denmark (no. 42) in terms of turnover, income, development in sales to other markets etc.

As I am traveling a lot there has not yet been time for further family planning, as one earlier marriage taught me that you need time for each other. My business has somehow developed into being  my hobby, but whenever I have the possibility I also do some sports. My preferred is tennis which I played since I was 8 years old.
 

 
From the Webmaster
 
1) On the very top of the KGM web site, I have added a new link called "Utilities". When you click on this, a new window will open where you will find further links to many Useful Utilities on the web.
 
You can track a package sent through any of the major courier companies; find worldwide telephone directories; find out "who's who" in any government in the world; convert languages; convert one measurement into another measurement; calculate the distance between any two cities on Earth; find out what major things happened on any given date etc.
 
This new feature (which will be continually expanded), combined with the existing "HK Links" and our standard "Rotary Links" should be a valuable source of information for just about anything you need to know. Cool stuff, huh ?
 
2) By the way, if you want to make KGM your "home page" (i.e. the web page which automatically appears as soon as you open your browser, then click on the little house at the top right hand side of the KGM page, then click "Yes" (this only works if you use Microsoft Internet Explorer).
 
Hence the KGM web site is more than just a pretty face, just like your Webmaster ! :-)
 
3) Finally, the RI web site at www.rotary.org has gone through a major transformation, and it is now better organised and has a far more attractive look & feel about it.
 
Unfortunately, during the "upgrade" process, they managed to change ALL their internal links, without telling me or any other of the hundreds of Rotary Webmasters throughout the world. As a result, all of the links I had from KGM to RI suddenly stopped working !!  The Phantom was not a happy camper, especially since this occurred while he was in Manila !
 
Anyway, I frantically managed to restore about 95% of the links to RI while I was in Manila, but a few dead links remain. I have sent a brickbat to the RI Webmaster and I hope I can have the links restored to 100% by the weekend.
 
In the meantime, if a link to RI does not work, please don't yell at me, OK? You'll hurt my tender feelings.
 
The Phantom

 
Presidential Quotation
 
"To Profit from good advice requires more wisdom than to give it."
John Churton Collins
 

 
Weakly Humour
 
Contributed by Eric, my son: What did the man say to the owner of a scrap yard, as he walked in one morning?
Answer: What y'reckon?
 
 A banker speaking sometimes sounds like a business typhoon,
which reminds me of a major bank in the world that made a bucket of money last year and is trying to justify charges on current account next year.
 
A maid at a famous hotel once was fired because she couldn't turn down a bed.
 
A bigamist is one who has loved not wisely but two well
 

 
Brain Teaser
 
Problems worthy of attack,
Prove their worth by fighting back.
Found in a book about Paul Erdos (the o has a " over it)' a math genius! 
 
You might not know that Pythagoras was a bit eccentric, in fact a vegetarian who refused to eat beans because they reminded him of testicles. Ofcourse you've all heard my joke about the Cannibal who lived to 140 years and claimed it was because he ate beans every day. When pressed for details as to what kind of beans he replied, "Human Beans!" 
But, I digress. Pythagoras  did a lot for mathematics, (so did Erdos). He also had an uncanny feel for individual numbers.  For instance he considered 220 and 284 friendly. Hello there two how are you? I'm fine thank you number 9. I suppose we could think of situations where such conversations could take place, "Come in number ten your time is up", but can anyone work out what is the special relationship that led the big Mr P to call these numbers friendly? This one isn't easy ... but I'll give you a clue ... it has something to do with their divisors.
URCHIN